This picture is called The Blue Dancer.
Picasso painted it in 1900, when he would have been twenty
years old just before the beginning of his Blue Period. I think it is
beautiful.
At that time he was still searching for his ‘voice’; trying
everything and copying everyone. The year before, Degas had shown a similar
painting of a blue dancer and young Picasso wanted to show what he could do
with the same subject matter. Recently, we went to the Picasso Museum in Malaga
where they have over three hundred works, some of them quite key. The Blue
Dancer isn’t amongst them unfortunately but there are interesting examples of
some very early stuff. Not the least interesting aspect is to see the portraits
he did of his wife Olga and son Paola painted when he was well into and beyond
his cubist phase, hung adjacent to some of his extreme Modernist works. They
are beautifully rendered paintings/likenesses. He didn’t paint his family in a
cubist style.
I hadn’t actually realised the extent to which he tried lots
of different painting styles. He painted like Van Gogh for a while and tried
Pointillism like Seurat. There are pictures that one might easily mistake for a
Gauguin and Impressionism and Surrealism were attempted [successfully]. But he
wanted to move on. In the brochure it says that he wanted to ‘escape the taboos
set up by mindless social convention and thought they can be breached by the
freedom of art’. Did Seurat stand still? Did he find a style that he could sell
and just stop trying new things? Was Picasso still pushing on because he could?
From memory, I think Seurat was only in his early thirties when he died and
famously of course, Vincent died at thirty-seven. Was it just the fact of
Picasso’s longevity that took him into ever more adventuress methods and means,
continuing to seek a new visual languge? If Vincent had lived to 91 would he
too have explored other visual languages? Dunno guv.
No comments:
Post a Comment