MOTHERS AND SONS [By Colm Toibin]. God, this is a boring
book. When did he write it? When he was sixteen? I finished it but I struggled
with the last story . . . the one set in
Spain. . . where everyone stares at one another’s crotches. He certainly isn’t
going to let you forget about his own sexual orientation . . . even in a
collection about mothers and sons. Reviews on Amazon are pretty good but
several people talk about a flat tone [code for boring?] the Guardian says he
captures moments of longing and loss. Where? Peoples Parties [Joni Mitchell] captures more longing and loss in
its two minutes fifteen seconds than this does in its entire 309 pages.
It’s all contrived. Okay, okay all novels are contrived. The Book of Strange New Things is
contrived Tinker Tailor is contrived,
Earthsea is contrived but they are
rooted in a believable world set on solid foundations. The author has done his
or her research and you know that such characters could really exist and that
they would behave exactly like this; with integrity and coherence.
I never believed in anyone in this collection.
MY BRILLIANT FRIEND [By Elena Ferrante]. I really liked
this. If your usual taste is Jack Reacher, you will find it painfully slow but
I love character-led stuff and of course it shows, never tells and you have to
use your intelligence to understand the nuances of what we are reading. It’s a
kind of Neapolitan My Struggle [Knausgaard] taking the reader
through the very early years of two girls in a poor neighbourhood; Elena is
still playing with dolls when we first meet her . . . and then on through the decades until
she and her brilliant friend Lila, reach
sixteen years of age. It has a great sense of place; the cultural aspects of
Southern Italy, Camorra, honour, vendettas are also fascinating. The time of
the late 50s and early sixties is also one of change both social and economic
and you can sense these events happening behind the scenes.
I see that some reviewers think that there are too many
characters, a trap that Knausgaard didn’t fall into and I agree that whilst she
is giving us the whole picture and you have to pay attention to detail if you
are writing about how nuanced our lives can be, it can get a bit turgid and
unrewarding at times . I felt the stuff about the shoes didn’t play well but
was tremendously interested in the relationship with Nino. Why do girls do
that? Why do they disregard the skinny, rather shabby but interesting one in
favour of the tall good-looking one? What are they going to talk about for the
rest of their lives?
Of course the title My
Brilliant Friend is slightly misleading: it’s really about Elena, not Lila.
There are three more books but I think I have read enough of
Elena for this lifetime.
GAP CREEK [By Robert Morgan]. Dare I say it again? Yet
another totally humourless American novel. Re-published in 2012 this was a
number one [American] best seller when it came out in 2000 as well as being an
Oprah Book of the Month. Very nicely written by Appalachian author Morgan it is
unsurprisingly set in rural Appalachia at the end of the nineteenth century, in
fact one of the key scenes takes place on New Years Day 1900. He is strong and
good on description, Here for example:
On the fourth day of
the cold spell, when the sky was clear as a big bubble the sun played its light
on, there was a knock on the door.
One example among many.
It’s about the
pioneer life, the struggles against the elements, the land, bad luck, the
weather, con-men who will kick you when you are down and a Christian community
who will pray passionately for you but offer no practical help when you need it
most. I found it formulaic; conflict; conflict; conflict. They have a flood,
they have a fire, you can almost hear Robert Morgan thinking, ‘what else can I throw at them?’ and
none of it is sufficiently mediated. It soon becomes a one-note drama of
simmering resentment. As I said at the beginning, very nicely written and the
central character, Julie is a wonderful creation but really what am I reading
this for? To suffer their hardships along side of them? To wonder if I would
have her fortitude? To learn what it was like to try to make a living on a
smallholding in North Carolina in the late nineteenth century?
Not honestly sure it was worth the effort.