EARLY ONE MORNING [By Virginia Baily]. It’s been a long
time, a very long time . . . in fact this could be the first time ever . . .
that I have read a novel without a single significant male character. Quite an
achievement Virginia Baily. Hope you are pleased with yourself.
Took me over a month to read; I never wanted to pick it up;
I don’t have the bandwidth for something like this. To be honest, I should have
stopped long before the end. It is 400 pages long; dense, dense, tell, tell. A
tsunami of words, hollow, meaningless. Someone put a review on Amazon that I
cannot really improve upon:
This novel has
interesting premises and very promising situations and settings, but it's very
slow at the same time that there's too much going on-- the relationship between
the central character and her father's mistress (potentially fascinating but
incompletely explored); the relationship between the protagonist and her
epileptic sister (also incompletely addressed); the relationship between the
protagonist and a priest is vague and her relationship with her adopted son is
odd in ways that are neither examined nor explained. It's not especially
well-written either-- it's wordy and even occasionally repetitive, redundant.
The plot isn't linear, which is OK, but incidents that could have foreshadowed
the climax are misplaced too close to the end. I had high expectations after
listening to an interview promoting the book on Radio 4's 'Women's Hour', but I
was ultimately disappointed.
Having said which, the central character, Chiara is a very
good creation and the famous Chapter 9 is worth staggering on to; if you are
still not caught up by Chapter 9, stop.
It cost me 0.01p on Amazon Marketplace; a brand-new unread
hardback copy. I do wonder if it is selling many copies Little Brown [?].
MAKE ME [By Lee Child]. This is the latest Jack Reacher
thriller, someone left it behind at our holiday apartment on the French Riviera.
£20 on the cover; someone is doing very well indeed.
Never read a Jack Reacher novel. Two very good things about
it: no cops [big plus point]; up to date technologically . . . they text [!]
they e mail [!] they remember to switch their phones on [!]. Brilliant.
It’s in very short chapters; haven’t really come across
that before, so that on page 116 you are on Chapter 22. Yes, short sentences as
well but I don’t mind that I write in a similar fashion, it brings impact when
you need it. It is dark, which I hadn’t expected and wasn’t prepared for.
Looking at the Amazon reviews, people seem to think it is too dark and in the
same way as I was, weren’t really prepared for it. No swearing; not one four-letter
fuck in the entire 420-pages even from the evil bad guys in Chicago.
Did I like it? It was OK. I raced through it. I had to
suspend credibility far, far too much. Buying all those guns in the middle of
nowhere? Jeez. And way too many coincidences: at least five doors that hadn’t
been locked and a gated community that should have been a major problem to
enter that they just sailed through. A little of that goes a long way.
The description of Reacher walking the town was spell-binding:
’He saw plenty of stuff’. Houses still lived in and some empty. Some
converted to offices. He saw a gas station and seed merchants. I’m all for
setting the scene but there were pages of this and it was mind numbing and it
kept on coming. The exciting part was when we were told that the town even
though it had been semi-circular was laid out in a grid. I could hardly put it
down.
Actually what I really thought was, if he submitted the
first three thousand words of this to an agent under the name Kikarin Chadwick,
rather than Lee Child he would receive a pretty severe rejection letter. Don’t
think I will read another one.
ALIAS GRACE [By Margaret Attwood]. My first Margaret
Attwood. I tried to read Handmaidens Tale
[twice] and found it . . . I don’t know . . . preachy? And gave up. This is
pretty preachy too, it was shortlisted for the Booker in 1996 the year Graham
Swift won it for Last Orders, which I
have read and liked. It’s okay. My main-man Hilary Mantel has added her own
thoughts on the back cover to the effect that she has a wonderful prose style
and indeed she has; beautifully constructed sentences which flow into apparently
convoluted paragraphs which then resolve themselves into . . . well . . .
literary fiction at its best. Try this from page 422:
Yet he doesn’t feel
she dislikes their conversations. On the contrary, she appears to welcome them,
and even to enjoy them; much as one enjoys a game of any sort, when one is
winning he tells himself grimly. The emotion she expresses most openly towards
him is a subdued gratitude.
He’s coming to hate
the gratitude of women. It is like being fawned on by rabbits, or like being
covered with syrup: you can’t get it off. It slows you down, and puts you at a
disadvantage. Every time some woman is grateful to him, he feels like taking a
cold bath. Their gratitude isn’t real; what they really mean by it is that he
should be grateful to them. Secretly they despise him.
Fawned on.
Genius. She flips tenses constantly from past to present and from first-person
to third, quite effortlessly. A writer completely on top of her craft, so why
spend five-hundred and fifty words on a mid-nineteenth Century sixteen-year old
servant girl in Canada? She isn’t interesting enough. Canada in 1843 isn’t
interesting enough. If one wrote 550 words say on David Attenborough’s life and
times that might be interesting but then again, it might not. She uses the
historical text to draw our attention to the hypocrisy of the times. Man
employs kitchen maid; gets kitchen maid pregnant; throws out kitchen maid onto
street; gets new kitchen maid; gets new kitchen maid pregnant . . . except
Grace bites back.
I can’t read anything for the pleasure of the prose so to
speak; there has to be something else.
No comments:
Post a Comment